Author Archive

  • Would the real John Hegarty please stand up

    About a week ago (August 5th) a new Twitter account appeared. Nothing strange in that. But this one belonged to John Hegarty, Worldwide Creative Director of BBH. The BBH whose offices we share.

    His account accumulated over a thousand followers in a matter of hours as word spread that one of the most well known ad agency creatives in the world had joined Twitter.

    However, within a day or so people began to suspect that this wasn’t the real deal. The language was poor and the tweeted quotes hackneyed. “Not the language of Hegarty” people cried via Twitter.

    On Monday night I tweeted that I was unfollowing the account. The 1990s management speak and trite ‘creative’ blatherings were too much. This was obviously an imposter. And I think I know who it is… Read full post

  • Collaborative working. New approaches.

    We’re working on a side project, the details of which can wait for another post, and the very nature of it has prompted us to devise new methods for team collaboration.

    Without giving too much away (I’m a bit over-excited and secretive about it) the service we’re designing consists of two parts: a website and an iPhone app strung together with an API. There are dependencies between each part of the service. Things that happen on the iPhone app need to be reflected on the site and vice versa. There are other nuances but at that’s the core of it, a simultaneous broadcast / receive from app to site and back.

    Working out where to begin wireframing the service proved tricky. With so many interdependencies it all became a bit chicken and egg.

    I could work on two things at once. I could go as far as possible with the mobile bit, then switch. And then back again. But it just didn’t feel comfortable. I thought I’d end up re-doing things over and over.

    Why not, though, recruit another team member and work simultaneously?

    Read full post

  • London cycle hire scheme. Ripe for a mobile app.

    Transport for London (TfL) have put out a call for apps to promote London’s new cycle hire scheme which launches at the end of July.

    This immediately caught my eye as it mixes two things that I love. Technology and cycling.

    TfL opened up their cycle hire API earlier this month to allow access to information around bike hire locations and pricing.

    I think this, mashed up with a few of TfL’s other APIs and a bit of smart phone magic would create an amazing mobile app service. It could help promote the scheme, encourage adoption and, vitally, aid TfL in defining future hire station locations and in adjusting and augmenting their current cycle path network.

    Read full post

  • UK General Election candidates, who are they really?

    Forget reading manifestos, analysing policy impact on your monthly take-home pay or weighing up the pros and cons of entry into the Euro. Who are our political leaders and, more importantly, what do we really think of them?

    What started as a conversation at SXSW launched in double-quick time just over a week ago after a flurry of code production and pixel shuffling.

    Read full post

  • Idea for a mobile app. Strategic shopping.

    Whilst wandering around an unfamiliar supermarket at the weekend (looking for Cous Cous) an idea for a mobile app suddenly hit me.

    How about a store-based product finder?

    It would work like this:

    • Fire it up;
    • the app knows what supermarket I’m in via GPS;
    • I start to type in a product name, the predictive search autocompletes my request; and
    • the app tells me which aisle the product is in.

    You could extend it to provide brand offers and alternatives. But at its heart it’s about getting round that frustration of trying to find a product in an unfamiliar supermarket when there are no staff members in sight.

    It could be white label that works in all supermarkets. It could be crowdsourced to help keep it up to date. Why not input your shopping list online and it gives you your list in the right order providing an efficient route around the supermarket?

    For those of us that like to execute our shopping trips like strategic shock-and-awe strikes it would be ideal.

  • A review of iMapMyRide for the iPhone

    On the recommendation of fellow cyclist Brian Sheridan who I met at SXSW (the conference that keeps on giving) I downloaded the iMapMyRide iPhone app last weekend to track my latest jaunt out on the bike.

    I’ve been a cyclist for about 20 years and have used many different handlebar mounted computers over that time. These show all the predictable stuff like trip distance, average speed, current speed, overall distance, pedal cadence and a few other things. All measured by magnets on the wheels and sensors attached to the frame. I’ve even used heart rate monitors when I was really serious (and fit).

    But this iMapMyRide app takes geekyness + sport to a new level.

    Read full post

  • Transient permanence

    In amongst all the digital talk at SXSW there was one panel that felt very analogue. In fact, it was about physical things. Titled “Maps, Books, Spimes, Paper: Post-Digital Media Design” or “Get excited and make things”.

    The panel took turns to present some of their projects which by and large involved creating physical, printed objects. Yeah, print. That dirty, high-friction mechanism for disseminating information.

    Chris Heathcote kicked things off with a core argument that ‘puter screens are inherently boring and mundane and that ‘digital’ is natural and not special anymore. He used Russell Davies’s term ‘post-digital’ which is about moving screen experiences into the real world.

    Michal Migurski of awesome-ists Stamen Design described his work for Open Street Map (OSM) project - Walking Papers. This allows people to download portions of the map, print it out and draw on edits. They can then use this, once scanned back in, to make micro-level edits to the online maps.

    James Bridle talked about his own publishing exploits, creating a fieldnotes book for his trip to SXSW which included maps, notes pages and the conference schedule. In one project he created a book containing all of his tweets from a two year period packaged in a classical-looking hardback tome. Cute.

    The panel presentations finished up with Ben Terrett of Really Interesting Group talking about their Newspaper Club. This is a web-based service allowing anyone to set up and print their own newspaper. They’ve already created loads, take a look at their blog.

    The session finished by giving out a limited edition paper to all attendees.

    4446844751_0bcfc34410

    Photo courtesy Ben Terrett under Creative Commons

    Read full post

  • It’s a wrap. SXSW over… ’til next year.

    I wrote a week or so ago about what I wanted to get from South by South West.

    Now it’s all over, the hangover has faded but the jetlag is lingering longer than would be ideal, there are a few observations from my first sxsw that I would like to share.

    The standout moment for me was Clay Shirky’s talk “Monkeys with Internet Access: Sharing, Human Nature, and Digital Data.” He captivated the audience for an hour, weaving together seemingly unrelated topics and themes (underwear, weather balloons, spherical trigonometry, Napster and the printing press, amongst others). He created a beautifully articulate argument for how abundance breaks more things than scarcity and raised the question around how much value we can get out of civic sharing.

    He even managed to answer some terminally dull, laborious questions with wit and create an interesting point where there was, seemingly, nothing to say. Clever.

    As I tweeted at the time, the best presenters are great story tellers. Clay Shirky is an awesome story teller. He also wore a three wolf moon t-shirt for extra awesomesauce™.

    I was probably not the only person to leave that auditorium wanting to be a better public speaker.

    I think one of the reasons his talk went down so well was that he went very deep into the subject. I found some of the panels merely skimmed the surface and left many people wanting more – which they often found by leaving the session. Either the participants judged their audience wrong or were, dare I say it, guilty of inadequate preparation.

    As someone said on Twitter – it’s all a bit Russian roulette with the sessions. Apparently, it always has been.

    You’d expect Keynotes to be the pinnacle of the conference though. The interview of Evan Williams, founder of Twitter, was one that fell way short of the mark. It was a weak interview that led to a queue to leave the enormous room. The back channel was alive with protestations at the dullness of it all. Here’s a compilation of just some of our chat.

    Poor old Eliot Van Buskirk who had to follow up with an interview of Daniel Ek, CEO and co-founder of Spotify, 24 hours later was visibly nervous as he took to the stage; conscious of an audience that wasn’t afraid of giving its tweets some teeth. But he made a much better fist of the interview than Umair Haque did of his session with Williams. His questions were more pointy and we actually gleaned some information from the interview. Like, for example, Spotify having 320,000 paying subscribers, 100 million playlists – 30% of which being complete albums – laying waste to the myth that the album as a format and concept is dead.

    Those panels that did dive deep were a pleasure to listen to, even if at times it was an individual holding the whole thing together. Johnny Lee of Microsoft – Applied Sciences talked, like Shirky, eloquently and concisely when discussing ‘new interaction paradigms’ (first prize for buzzword bingo). His piece was littered with a number of nuggets of detail and insights – fired off too quickly to get down. Will be hunting down the session video when it is available later in the year.

    As a side point. How come I’ve heard a number of tremendously switched-on people from Microsoft talking about their work with some awesome advances in computing technology? What’s the barrier between the output of these visionaries and the marketplace? I think that company needs a few more people like Johnny Lee and Blaise Aguera y Arcas and less Balmers.

    It’s also worth mentioning Ze Frank’s session. Never mind him working in a parallel universe, I think it’s probably more tangential. He talked about some of the things he’s done over the years exploring human emotions. I took a lot more away from this session than James. Yes, what he does is disposable and often whimsical. But some of it, I feel, provides a real insight into human emotions and he has a great knack of turning a sterile digital space into something quite emotionally charged. His thought patterns, work rate and variety are startling. He makes me want to do more.

    But, as Tim says, SXSW is as much about the people you meet. The parties were excellent, the conversation inspiring, Twitter avatars we brought to life and to be frank I can’t f***ing wait ’til 2011.

  • What I’m hoping for from SXSW

    I’ve been to loads of conferences over the years. Most of them have left me feeling ‘whelmed’ at best and at most other times frustrated.

    I blogged last year about one conference I attended in London last May. There was a general feeling that the speakers offered nothing new, virtually no excitement or insight and most of the talks boiled down to a personal retrospective. That’s fair enough you may say, but the conference was billed as being about the future of the industry.

    It felt as if the speakers had just been asked to turn up and speak about anything they wanted. No vetting by the organiser and seemingly very little brief to the speakers.

    As such I’ve given up on any conferences this year. Apart, obviously, from the biggy. The one we’re all off to.

    Read full post

  • Time for a reassessment of the human-computer interface

    A great blog post by Lukas Mathis has been floating around Twitter for a few days now. In it he talks about the removal of features in software development. Specifically:

    If you don’t pay attention, what started out as an elegant, simple application that perfectly solves a single problem, can quickly turn into a huge behemoth of an application that solves a ton of problems, but solves all of them poorly.

    This, and some other tweet comments, got me thinking about the iPad (who isn’t?) and how I believe it’s a glimpse of the future for how we interact with personal computers.

    In the 35 years since the arrival of the personal computer we’ve been on a continuous upward trajectory of feature enhancement and specification bloat. It’s not just the software, it’s infecting the very machines that we run the bloated software on.

    Read full post

Our latest tweets

Categories

Archives

Find us on the web