Mostly gloom for glossies

The New York Times reports here on the fall in magazines’ ad pages (and no doubt revenues) and sugars the pill with a cute piece of interactive information design (would have been good to have the year by year between ‘05 and ‘08 though, to see how must was systemic and how much was credit crunch-induced).

The Times says: “Another day, another closure. Magazines are becoming thinner as advertising pages fall, and publishers are grimly cutting underperforming titles. But the outlook is not dour for all — a handful of magazines are still expanding their ad lineups, some by startlingly high percentages.”

It so happens that Elle and the Economist are notable risers, but they’re in a very small minority; Business Week, Time, The New Yorker and Fortune are big fallers.

About the author

William is strategy director and a founding partner at Made by Many. He’s been helping companies open up their services to consumers, and consumers to become producers and collaborators, since the late 1990s when a career in journalism, investment banking and brand strategy revealed method in its madness by shining a light on the wicked problems of service design. William can also be found at twitter.com/wdowen.

  • Comments (0)

  • Responses (0)

Leave a comment

Our latest tweets

Categories

Recent comments

  • James Higgs: At some level Kujau wanted the attention, and the same seems to be true of Manning if he is indeed t...
  • William Owen: Sara, you've asked lots of pertinent questions here but I think you’re really asking quite a lot of ...
  • Sara Williams: James, as much as I want to agree with you -- you are right a very good percentage of the time -- th...
  • James Higgs: There is a certain logic to this: people are unlikely to go through a great deal of effo...
  • Tim Malbon: I think we should remember that we are in Afghanistan because its leaders allowed it to be used as a...