-
When I grow up I’d like to be more like a start-up
Justin’s ‘Agile versus Strategy‘ post has tapped an excellent debate.
One of the most interesting comments comes from R/GA’s William Charnock, who makes the point that traditional ad agencies got rid of ‘the makers’:
They outsourced production to directors, photographers, digital technology specialists etc and carved off media execution to separate media agencies. With no ability to prototype, experiment or execute in the real world, the only option for them was to focus on ‘conceptual thinking’ or ‘BDUF’.
Some forward thinking agencies seem to be addressing this, if only on a small scale, setting up labs for experimentation (a la Ogilvy, BBH, Media labs etc.); creating partnerships with content creators, VC’s and start-ups (who truly are the leaders in market agility and fast fail learning/prototyping).
As William and other commenters say, it’s the start-ups who are the true leaders in this space – not least in terms of overall value creation. Indeed, you could argue that the ’start up culture’ of high-growth tech start-ups has become a defining (and disruptive) force in work cultures well beyond tech, marketing and media.
To traditional agencies start-ups must seem superhuman, and super-scary. Look at FourSquare: in just 12 months and with a mere handful of smart, motivated people they’ve created an entirely new media ecosystem and platform, not to mention a service that people actually love. They’re already working with lots of brands, including Starbucks, Pepsi, Zagat, Bravo, Conde Nast and The New York Times. Thousands of awesome campaigns for thousands of clients will run on FourSquare in the coming months and years. Brands will use FourSquare to add real, everyday value to their customer’s lives instead of wasting money pissing them off in expensive bursts. Agencies must look at FourSquare and worry.
Traditional agencies would love to bring some of these uber-makers inside the castle walls – but how’s that going to work? Unless agencies can find some way of giving these start-up punks some skin in the game, what’s in it for them? Why would they? They don’t need agencies, because they’re busy replacing them.
Of course, we’ll see agencies piling into software development, and they’ll certainly look more like tech start-ups – but that’s different to getting the ’start up culture’ inside. Unless you can address structural issues like ownership, autonomy and putting engineers in at the top this simply won’t work – and those are fairly big asks. Stuart and I were discussing the fact that most industries realised they’d needed CTOs and CIOs in at the top a few years ago – but which ad agency has a CTO sitting at the highest level, on the Board? They may be frightened right now but perhaps not enough – until this happens I’m just not sure you could really say it’s being taken seriously enough.
Meanwhile, FourSquare is launching brilliant stuff on a weekly basis – and there’s still only 16 of them. And there are many, many FourSquare’s out there. If you were starting out today and were bright and ambitious – who would you rather work for?
-
The gang’s back on home turf
One cowboy hat, four flights, six blog posts, dozens of sessions, hundreds of tweets and waaay too many tequila shots later, Made by Many is home from Austin and over the jet lag (well, some of us are doing better on that one than others).
There are a few blog posts in the pipeline about the various things we saw/heard/did at SXSW and the Deep Thoughts touched off thusly. But before we get all serious, here’s something a little more playful — an insight into the Made by Many culture, if you will.
Before we went to Texas we discussed the importance of having a gang sign to demonstrate a) belongingness to MxM and b) just how dangerously cool we really are. Below, Simon demonstrates the clever Made by Many (hands make Ms, then cross your wrists for the X) gang sign:

Ideally, the sign is executed with a lunge — that sort of ups the awesomeness ante.
-
A call to arms. Make way for ‘the builders’.
Rishad Tobaccowala’s blog post at Reinventing, and his speech at the American Association of Ad Agencies Transformation conference, are both incredibly exciting.
With both, he calls for renewal and appeals to the ad industry to save itself by hiring in top tier talent to build a new world, specifically:
“This is the time to build. The talent we most need are builders, sculptors, painters. Folks who create and not just manage.”
And what should we be building?
-
I love words: manopause, faffage, hellacious
I learned to read a long time ago, but I can still remember the sheer amazingness of the discovery — like I’d found the keys to the universe and all of a sudden, EVERYTHING made sense. Words were everywhere and I was powering through them like a mad thing (and mispronouncing a fair few, I ought to add).

Some years later, not that much has changed. I still read like a mad thing and I still love words. Only now there are more words to love, from the solid everyday standbys (“wattage”, “traveller”, “coax”) to the niche-y specialists you bring out for added pounce(“peripatetic”, “disingenuous”) when time and audience are right.
The thing that really makes my head spin is the way language evolves. Even as I type this, old words are morphing and merging to send nifty little neologisms strutting out of our cultural soup of signifiers, all a-dazzle with tasty wordiness. Perhaps my favourite of these is the portmanteau, a linguistic mashup of two words and their meanings.
For some time, I’ve been meaning to make a list of the niftiest new (or new to me) words I come across in daily parlance. Here are three I have enjoyed this week, with more to come as I encounter them.
Manopause
Noun: a break from dating, flirting, and all forms of sexual interaction with men
“He is totally giving you the eye, go for it!”
“I can’t, I’m on a manopause. He’s fit though — get in there, Shaz.”Faffage
Collective noun: timewasting, to-ing and fro-ing and general faffing
“You’re right — there is a direct correlation between the number of children a person has and the degree of faffage involved in their getting from A to B. Thank God we chose art over ankle-biters.”
Hellacious
Adjective: really awful with a sort of visceral twinge; a combination of hellish and atrocious
“During the coldest night that winter in Siberia, Ferdinand was forced to rise every hour to stoke the fire with priceless Louis XIV furniture. For an antiques dealer it was a truly hellacious experience.”
Photo courtesy of New York Public Library, used under a Creative Commons licence
-
Are we just mice trapped in a digital ‘Skinner Box’?
Yay… many thanks to Ben for mailing this awesome blog post from the O’Reilly Radar blog, by Jim Stodghill. Today is supposed to be the most depressing day of the year, so it’s time I finally tried to finish.
For nigh on two weeks now Jim’s post has freaked me out. I have wondered if I am a bit like this mouse. I certainly recognised some of my own obsessive digital behaviour in his brilliantly written and moving account of life as a “digital stimulusaholic”. He describes being engulfed in a deep personal crisis, an addiction within which he feels utterly trapped. He talks of a cognitive biological barrier to our information processing powers. And the paradox of being infinitely distracted by infinite information. It’s pretty disturbing.
It’s even more worrying that this isn’t your average ’social-networking-and-Twitter-is-bad-for-you” rubbish. You can toss that sort of thing aside in a moment – but Jim is one of us. He a geek. He loves Twitter… a lot (actually that’s a big part of his problem). No, this is someone who’s done his time in the twenches. He’s a super-user, or more accurately a super-abuser. And yet it’s also massively entertaining – a bit like Trainspotting.
But hold on, what the heck is a Skinner Box?
-
Pulling Off The Optimal Platform Job
Another week, another blog post on the subject of “why creative advertising folk need to embrace ‘technologists and their geeky ways’” once again ignites vigorous debate.
The post in question is by Joe Mele, VP Client Partner at Razorfish, and received a great many comments and a huge number of re-tweets of the @BBHLabs‘ tweet that contained a link to it. The citizens of Twitter seem to react with a combination of self-loathing and schadenfreudian glee to the disruption that social technologies are wreaking on advertising. It’s a little bit dull and frankly misses the point – and it wasn’t quite (I don’t think) what Joe was saying.
Of course, how advertising responds to the digital challenge is a roasting hot topic. Joe’s blog post quotes a recent article from Ad Age provocatively titled ‘Agencies Need To Start Thinking Like Software Companies’ that talks about hybrid creative techies bringing digital know-how to Madison Avenue. If only it were that easy. It seems overly simplistic to claim that everything will be okay if they hire in some digital savvy, perhaps even ‘developers’ – let them attend client meetings and, you know, even help out with creative ideas and stuff.
Unfortunately, I think it’s a lot more complex than that – and whilst I totally agree with everything Barbarian Group Co-founder Rick Webb, says in the Ad Age article, I’m not convinced he *totally* nails it either:
What they should have been taking away all of this time — and have increasingly begun to — are the concepts of the constant beta and agile development. Marketers need to abandon the time-limited campaign online and start to think of it as a constant application of a rigorous discipline.
Rick’s completely right about needing an agile, adaptive, evolutionary approach, but I’m starting to believe that you need more than that to deliver the kind of long-term living platforms and platform-campaigns – and value – that clients need and agencies must get better at creating. I’m starting to believe you need four things, the first two of which are well-known and increasingly often quoted:

