Posts Tagged ‘Facebook’

  • Excellent, a real-life Skinner Box

    Instead of rodents, they’re using journalists – and instead of a Skinner Box they’ll be locked inside a French farmhouse in Perigord for five days and only allowed to access Twitter and Facebook.

    The experiment – run by RFP the French-language public broadcasters association – will discover how warped our perception of the world could become if we rely solely on Twitter and Facebook.

    Like anyone would do that!

    The journalists will continue to report the news as they see it – coming solely through tweets, hashtags, status updates, messages and – gulp – contextual advertising.

    What a great experiment, but five days is clearly nowhere near long enough. A year would be more like it. And the floor should be electrified, with mild shocks being dispensed for inaccurate reporting, and fags and booze dispensed to the journo-rodents for getting it right. A house of correction. Could this be the model for a distributed social media version of Big Brother where contestants are placed under house-arrest and allowed only to connect with other contestants – and Big Brother – via Twitter and Facebook?

    It kind of reminds me of the Biosphere 2 experiment, photos of which were posted on Boing Boing earlier this month. I’ve always thought the Biosphere story would make a great horror film, or musical comedy, or both. Imagine if a mystery virus wipes most of the Earth’s population out while they’re in there… and they have to listen to the whole world dying on Facebook and Twitter… and then use these services to coordinate the rebuilding of the human race.

    Tres awesome. Starts February 1.

  • How Facebook is digging a grave for online marketing

    This morning, as you do when you quietly settle in at your desk and get prepared for a long day at work, I logged in to Facebook to check what my social circle around the world is up to. For whatever reason, my eyes fell on the forbidden spot, the advertising in the right hand corner. Oh wait, I know why. It was ’speaking’ to me:

    Facebook avertising

    Look at that! Not only does it know I am 39 (nearly as old as Tim) but it also knows that I am female, and although I can’t say this for sure, this little ad also seems to have figured out that one of my favourite colours is … pink (No, I haven’t revealed the colour of my bra in my status line).

    As it happens, super agency Made by Many is already supplying me with an awesome phone, but I got interested in this deal nevertheless. Not because the offer was appealing, but seemingly offered exclusively to me, I could not resist clicking on the ad to find out more. I wanted to know why this offer was made to 39 year old women… is this for real…? So I clicked the ad…. and… Read full post

  • Why you should pay attention to your friends of friends (and their friends)…

    How people affect and influence each other via networks is a very popular topic these days.

    Stumbled on on this very interesting article titled “Is Happiness catching?” in The New York Times published the day after my write up on John Cacioppo’s talk at the RSA on how loneliness is contagious.

    Read full post

  • Climate Squad: from social media to social movement

    Made by Many is pleased as punch to announce the launch of climatesquad.org.uk, a platform for joining and organising actions to halt climate change that’s also the first of a series of initiatives by V to change the way youth volunteering works in the UK.

    climatesquadhome1

    V is an organisation funded by the Office of the Third Sector to promote and fund volunteering for 16-25 year olds. V came to Made by Many 8 months ago, asking us to create a vision for future volunteering with the expectation that digital engagement would reduce barriers to young people joining in voluntary action. In May we started working on Climate Squad, joint funded by V and Bank of America, as the first implementation of the strategy we defined with V.

    Read full post

  • RSA talk: Connected Minds, Loneliness & Social Brains

    picture-22

    Some time back, I wrote a very frustrated post on how experts from the field of psychology make sweeping generalizations of what it means to use online services like twitter, facebook and other social networking sites.

    Read full post

  • Designing motivational services

    We use Basecamp to manage projects. It’s great for creating tasks and milestones that can be assigned to those responsible. It keeps conversations neatly organized in threads while you can attach documents/screen shots to these.

    There’s loads of similar web based services out there. But although they might be easy to use, this is in no way a guarantee that people stay on top of recording (or even completing!) their tasks.  A few weeks into the project you often find that the whole group, previously collaborating in one space, have moved the whole thing offline, into their separate in-boxes and what have you. Now things have turned a little bit Texas.

    Perhaps this happens because most systems are designed around the users functional needs while the motivational and emotional bits are completely ignored. Well, you may say… does it matter if a system is boring to use if it does what it says on the tin..?

    That’s true if you’re happy to get on with things, tick the check box when the job is done and don’t worry much about the mundane aspect of it all… But if you’re one of us ‘daydreaming slackers’ who are driven mad by this humdrum type activity then you might need a little ‘kick’ to get going.

    In spite of having the same functional needs to complete a task, we’re rarely motivated by the same stuff. Some take pleasure in seeing a completed check list, others can only recall what a painful job it was to get there. You can split these groups of preferences into even smaller ones. That’s why it is an enormous challenge to design motivational aspects into services.

    Reward and punishment are two very common strategies for motivation. Often only one is in use at a time:
    picture-124

    picture-1301

    Sometimes, the two are in use simultaneously… “If you eat all your peas, you’ll get dessert…”

    I don’t think there’s any doubt that collaborative systems would be much more effective if they were designed with motivational features. Just look at games – using both strategies, they’re designed to make us desire to progress to the next level.

    An example of this is Farmville on Facebook. Keep on top of your farmer responsibilities and you’ll earn money. Forget, and your crop will wilt. The horror. It’s unpleasant.

    Obviously farming won’t be everybody’s cup of tea, but neither will, uhmm, time sheeting…

    Anyway, Famville is a FB application that cleverly gives the user a clear incentive to frequently spam their walls with game info at the same time as giving their friends a reason to lurk around their wall, waiting for this to happen…

    The game keeps you fussing and caring for your farm by giving you ribbons whenever you’ve accomplished a goal. In true FB style, there’s a ribbon for nearly everything – harvest enough to build your cash reserve, then buy a few buildings and hey hey presto – you’re awarded a great architect ribbon and a gift.

    picture-127

    Pick fruit from at least 5 trees and you’ll get the amazingly rare “knock on wood ribbon”. The ribbons are then posted on your wall so you can bask in a well deserved glory – but wait! Just because you’re so great, your friends should get rewarded too…. click [ Get a bonus from Elin ] and a bonus sum will be added to your game money. Clever. Now I feel guilty when I don’t share these posts on my wall.

    picture-126

    (I’m not going to mention names, but there’s quite a few loiterers hanging around my wall these days….)

    There’s lots more to Farmville, but that’s not the point of this post. Neither is to turn Basecamp or similar services into Farmville…

    For all of us who design services, it is very important to put aside purely functional needs for some moments and think about how to motivate users.

    I’d be gutted if I logged into Basecamp and found all my tasks wilted. On the other hand, life would be quite alright if every hour entered in my Harvest timesheets resulted in some beautiful, personal data visualisation at the end of the month.. or better yet, I could pick up a bonus reward every time @stueccles completes his:)

  • Protect The Human, now with Facebook Connect

    flickpic

    We’re very excited about today’s launch of Facebook Connect for Protect The Human, Amnesty International UK’s digital campaigning platform. Facebook Connect is great for external websites because of the huge social potential it offers (for those of you that have doubts, look at this presentation), but it is even more important for a site like Protect The Human because of the worthy causes Amnesty International supports. Protect The Human is all about rallying your friends behind human rights causes that you as an individual care a lot about. It is about transforming the power of an individual into the power of many. And, as Barack Obama said,

    One voice can change a room, and if one voice can change a room, then it can change a city, and if it can change a city, it can change a state, and if it change a state, it can change a nation, and if it can change a nation, it can change the world. Your voice can change the world.

    It’s pretty simple, really – all you need to do is sign in to Protect The Human, connect to Facebook with the Facebook Connect button, and start inviting your friends to join. Also, when you take specific actions on Protect The Human such as sending an email to ensure there is no crackdown on protests in Iran, you can post a notification to Facebook, alerting your friends there and (hopefully) encouraging many of them to do the same.

    THIS is why the internet is truly powerful.

  • Is FriendFeed the new Twitter?

    I’ve noticed a spike in the number of follows I’m getting through FriendFeed in the last few weeks. I guess it might reflect the changes that FriendFeed recently made to their service: it’s now a bit more presentable to a non-hardcore audience – it feels like Twitter with a dash of Facebook.

    Despite its no-nonsense, extreme-user aesthetic, FriendFeed has a few features that might help ‘normal’ people manage the flood of stuff.

    1. You can categorise feeds you subscribe to, and they provide an integrated Groups feature. For ‘normal’ as opposed to ’super’ users these are probably more useful for following or aggregating a story than Twitter’s #hashtag syntax (which is confusing and user-unfriendly – and almost feels a bit like a return to the command line in some ways). Surely brands could use this feature – is it just that FriendFeed is a bit geeky still?
    2. I also like the auto-update in real time aspect of the basic service. I’m sure Twitter could do this quite simply (it’s the main thing that people like about TweetDeck after all isn’t it?).
    3. You can integrate feeds of ALL the digital services you use – it’s potentially the one ring to rule them all (although we all know the dangers of that…)

    On the other hand, I think it would be VERY difficult to follow 1,000 people on FriendFeed: you’d just get too much. I’ve wired up my Delicious, Last.fm, Twitter, Flickr, Brightkite and Seesmic accounts – as well as various blogs. I realised that although I rarely go to FriendFeed.com I am actually posting far more there – like FAR more – than I ever do at Twitter. I’m very much more selective about who I follow at FriendFeed for this reason, BUT the fact that FF sits on top of all these services, joins everything up and provides a kind of social dashboard *might* make me think twice if they can sort out the information overload issues and sprinkly just a tiny bit of seduction over the service. What I’m looking for is something like [Tweetdeck + the multiple account feature of Seesmic Desktop] + [Firefox] + [FriendFeed but with a beautiful social dashboard].

    Is that too much to ask??

    I’ve just installed MotherFeed App so that I can test out the iPhone goodness of FriendFeed. I’ll let you know how it goes.

  • Looking swell online: How avatars suit you

    My avatar has changed.

    Uh oh. Big deal, you might think – some people change their avatars as often as they change shoes. And so do I – but not here at my work blog.

    For the past half year I’ve been writing under a stranger’s face – a “spare” avatar bestowed upon me by Isaac until yesterday.

    At first, I found it awkward to write and felt slightly irritated by being represented by a stranger. Whenever I published a post, this mean, hungry little lady with black hair and a sour pout would pop out like a Jack in the Box from somewhere deep inside Wordpress, ready to devour my every character. I’d look at the site and feel disconnected from my words. Now the blog post was hers… she even wore my name!

    My old avatar

    At Made by Many, we have a love/hate relationship with our work avatars. Drawn by an artist who’s been given quite a lot of artistic license, we’re not always in agreement weather a whiff of green to our skin tone or a splash of purple hair really help bring out our best features…. Some of us have now and then been known to refuse to blog under these “dreadful caricatures”, but the truth is that they do make us feel like a team and we all wear them like a badge of honor.  “At least we don’t take ourselves too seriously!” says William.

    But self-representation and avatar usage can be a serious matter online. The avatars we chose to represent ourselves have an impact on how we behave and also on how we’re perceived online.

    That’s why sites that easily allow you to change your avatar often are more engaging and interactive. People change their avatar to reflect their mood, send secret messages to other friends, display self- attributes, social role, a fantasy representation of who they want to be or they might just want to provoke. Just look at this collection of people from the Metrotwin homepage:

    Metrotwin people

    Metrotwin people

    If you look closer at the Metrotwin people, you’ll find a lot of stereotypical usage: The football enthusiast, the pet lovers, the travelers, the proud parent, the beauty, the humorist, the hobbyist, the eye, the cartoonist, the standard portrait and so on. And if you hit refresh when you’re on the site – you’ll see these types repeat again and again. I find this incredibly fascinating – seeing people’s creative use of avatars make me much more interested in finding out what’s going on at a site and communicate with the people who use it.

    But not all of us are fans of creative self representations online… In a talk on Facebook given by Blake Chandlee last year, he mentioned his dislike of people who aren’t using their real photo to represent themselves, especially those touting a pet pic on their profile.

    I first thought he was just being funny… but then I came across this thread on a FB discussion group where people complain that their profiles are deleted when they use “fluffy” avatars and “kittens” as profile pics. Says Pamela Noordman:

    picture-70

    Facebook is one of the better examples there is of a site that makes it easy and fun for people to maintain multiple avatars. So why they give their user this functionality just to tell them later they don’t like the way they use it is beyond me…

    Although I’d always be supporting the user’s right to wear the hat they want and my Facebook avatar seldom stays the same for more than a few days – I’m not entirely disagreeing with Chandlee. The amount of complaints I’ve gotten from twitter followers who’re confused when they come from twitter to this blog proves the importance of a consistent, recognizable avatar.

    I’m very happy to finally blog under an avatar that look and feel more like myself, although the first comment I got on my new, real avatar was someone questioning weather or not I was wearing a fox on my head…now that was a bit rude, don’t you think?

Our latest tweets

Categories

Archives

Find us on the web