Posts Tagged ‘newspapers’

  • Service principles for the post-modern news organisation

    Service principles illustrate the way a service creates, captures and sustains value for customers and shareholders.
    They’re a useful benchmark in making decisions, (eg. ‘‘Should we retain a proprietary or open service platform?’. ‘Does this process deliver value to the customer or simply make life easier for the business?’).
    This is a heavily adapted set of service principles we created for a client, a specialist financial newspaper behind a paywall (hence the first two principles) which we think might work for any news organisation making the treacherous journey from industrial to post-modern media. We’ve called this organisation The Newspaper.
    The list must have lots of holes – are there any big ones? – and is much too long – how should we shorten it?  - and shifts between strategic and tactical issues – does that matter?
    1. Shape the business model to sustain print subscriptions, but not at the cost of standing still
    OK, this is very specific to subscription services, and reflects the reality that print circulation and advertising still account for the vast majority of revenue. How do you make the transition to new revenue streams without killing the old ones. Digital revenues tend to cannibalise print revenues, yet you need to demonstrate the explicit value of digital. Ask Rupert. There’s more than one answer though: charging a stupidly small amount of money for print for a short period of time is one way, or a stupidly high amount for premium online services is another. However the latter only works in a niche market with exclusive value. Here’s an example of the no brainer ‘get print too’ deal (not our client).
    2. Launch against yourself (in a strictly controlled way)
    The Newspaper brand strengthens our ability to create new revenue streams, but The Newspaper legacy restricts our scope for action. We should act to limit these restrictions by thinking creatively, changing culture and ‘failing fast’ in a Laboratory environment (cf.); this will enable The Newspaper to confront digital native start-ups at lower risk to our existing business. Here’s another example of what we mean, from the same source:
    3. Establish online and mobile as integral components of The Newspaper’s valued services, not just an add-on.
    This principle has implications for everything we do and especially the way we organise and reward individuals and teams. The value of online content and commercial revenues should be re-evaluated and the status of achieving online financial and editorial success raised.  (In other words, don’t save the story for the front page, get it online; and stop the ad team giving away free online ads to sell juicy full page print display)
    4. Make regular assessments of what lies inside or outside the paywall
    Things move quickly on the internet and what’s exclusive to The Newspaper one day may not be the next. When charging for content or services, ask: Is it essential for its intended audience? Is it exclusively or first available at The Newspaper? Is it conveniently delivered; does it enable the audience to create value themselves? If none of these apply then the offer has become commodified – put it outside the paywall.
    5. The Newspaper online is a service as well as a product, and this means treating readers as partners, not consumers
    Service-not-product means that the brand, the services, the organisation (especially journalists and editors) come into more direct and frequent contact with customers and should act as a solicitous and considerate host; it means that The Newspaper is involved in more parts of the value chain between a customer’s desires and their fulfillment, including interactions in which the customer is a participant, not a consumer. This has an impact on design, culture and on resources, especially editorial culture and resources. Here’s an example of services (in green) around different content types (in pink) and their valuable bi-produts (in blue). Remember, the value is in the service around the content, not the content itself.
    6. Users may create the most valued content for each other.
    So give them the tools to make it. And add services to your content that enable your customers to increase its value – as above.
    7. Give customers a voice; their voice has value.
    Services that enable customers to express opinion (vote, rate, comment, share) create trend data and customer data with value in its own right that can be played back to the audience and/or sold on to premium subscribers, advertisers or corporate customers. And likewise, we no longer have a monopoly of privileged sources or information: our readers may no more than we do, better than we do.
    8. Services that enable users to personalize and store data encourage loyalty
    The audience has invested time to obtain utility, as well as generating useful customer information with value to advertisers. They won’t want to waste that effort.
    9. Creating valued niche products is vital to online success
    The Newspaper as one big package doesn’t translate online. The Newspaper online need not be one thing for all customers. Digital enables products and services to be packaged and sold and deconstructed with infinite variety, according to need, to niche markets; The Newspaper can and should vary the scope, scale and voice of the proposition for different audiences within the boundaries of quality set by the brand.
    10. Foster synergies between channels and recognise channel differences
    The Newspaper is the brand champion; the web has infinite depth and breadth; mobile offers ubiquity and convenience. Each product niche can exploit multiple channels. Each channel should point to the others (eg. a permalink for every newspaper page).
    11. The Newspaper is not of itself merely ‘a newspaper’ – The Newspaper is a brand.
    The brand offers information and products for the financial professional, the business manager, the private investor and the corporation. The brand can be extended into any area where its qualities – such as inside knowledge, professional network, good with money – have value
    12. Protect and build the value of The Newspaper brand
    There’s a tried and tested set of commercial and professional standards in newspapers – everyone knew the rules (around the separation of advertising and editorial, for example) that preserve the integrity of the editorial product. New principles are needed, and especially around commercial recommendations. Readers don’t mind being sold too, but they’ll buy because they trust you, so it better be the best. Don’t enter into partnerships that destroy the value of the brand.
    13. Print web first It’s not sustainable to behave as though the newspaper is the one and only place that important news can be published.
    14. We have unlimited space online, use it
    This means opening up the filing cabinet, replacing the news pyramid with the news iceberg – it goes deep down into the waters. Use the web to publish or link to everything you have: background, archive, source material, images – become a curator of themes.
    15. Connect to the rest of the web openly
    The Newspaper’s content and tools will live as effectively outside its URL as inside. If we make our content available widely, paid or unpaid, we raise our profile and increase our reach internationally and domestically; we also undercut clippings agencies and other copiers. Remember, the value is in the service around the content, not the content itself. So, use rss, third party feeds, The Newspaper API(s) and widgets to give people access to The Newspaper outside The Newspaper.com. And if in doubt, give it out.
    Our competition isn’t just other newspapers
    We’re up against every source of news over every channel and many news organisations act very differently to traditional newspapers, and so we will too, which leads us to…
    17. Treat competitors as partners
    This is how the rest of the web works. What makes us so different that we don’t have to give, share and collaborate?

    Service principles encapsulate the way a service creates, captures and sustains value for customers and shareholders.

    They’re a useful benchmark in making decisions in unfamiliar territory, (eg. ‘‘Should we retain a proprietary or open service platform?’. ‘Does this process deliver value to the customer or simply make life easier for the business?’, ‘What limit should we place on advertising that interrupts the customer experience?).

    This is a remade set of service principles we originally created for a client, a specialist financial newspaper behind a paywall (hence the first and second in the list, which we shouldn’t get too hung up about) and which we’ve since adapted quite heavily to work for a generic organisation we’ve called The Newspaper embarking on the treacherous journey from industrial to post-modern media.

    See what you think. The list must have lots of holes – are there any big ones? – and it’s much too long at an unmemorable 15! – how should we shorten it?  - and it shifts between strategic and tactical issues – does that matter? How should we reorder them to reflect importance? It’s an unformed lump of clay, published on the principle ‘just get it out there’. Please weigh in, feel free. Here goes:

    1. Shape the business model to sustain print subscriptions and build new revenue sources

    This is very specific to paid subscription services where there’s a print legacy, and it’s hard to do; it reflects the reality that print circulation matters hugely because it determines the value of the biggest source of advertising revenue. How do you make the transition to new revenue streams without killing the old ones? Digital revenues tend to cannibalise print revenues, yet you might need to demonstrate the explicit value of digital. Ask Rupert. There’s more than one answer as to how to do it: charging a stupidly small amount of money for print for a short period of time is one way, or a stupidly high amount for premium online services is another. . Here’s an example of the no brainer ‘get print too’ deal (not our client).

    FT subscription ad

    2. Make regular assessments of what should be inside or outside the paywall

    Paid-for news services only work in a niche market with exclusive value. Things move quickly on the internet and what’s exclusive to The Newspaper one day may not be the next. When charging for content or services, ask: Is it essential for its intended audience? Is it exclusively or first available at The Newspaper? Is it more conveniently delivered; does it enable the audience to create value themselves? If none of these apply then the offer has become commodified – put it outside the paywall.

    3. Launch against yourself (in a controlled way)

    The Newspaper brand strengthens our ability to create new revenue streams, but The Newspaper legacy restricts our scope for action. We should act to limit these restrictions by thinking creatively, changing culture and ‘failing fast’ in a Laboratory environment; this will enable The Newspaper to confront digital native start-ups at lower risk to our existing business.

    4. Establish online and mobile as integral components of The Newspaper’s valued services, not just an add-on.

    This principle has implications for everything we do and especially the way we organise and reward individuals and teams. The value of online content and commercial revenues should be re-evaluated and the status of achieving online financial and editorial success raised.  (In other words, don’t save the story for the front page, get it online; and stop the ad team giving away free online ads to sell juicy full page print display)

    5. The Newspaper online is a service as well as a product, and this means treating readers as partners, not consumers

    Service-not-product means that the brand, the services, the organisation (especially journalists and editors) come into more direct and frequent contact with customers and they should act as solicitous and considerate hosts; it means that The Newspaper is involved in more parts of the value chain between a customer’s desires and their fulfillment, including interactions in which the customer is a participant, not a consumer. This has an impact on design, culture and on resources, especially the editorial culture that says “put the copy on the spike and move on”. Here’s an example of services (in green) around different content types (in pink) and their valuable bi-produts (in blue). Remember, value lies in the service around the content, not just the content itself.

    News services

    6. Users may create the most valued content for each other.

    So give them the tools to make it. And add services to our content that enable our customers to increase its value – as above.

    7. Give customers a voice; their voice has value.

    Services that enable customers to express opinion (vote, rate, comment, share) create trend data and customer data with value in its own right that can be played back to the audience and/or sold on to premium subscribers, advertisers or corporate customers. And likewise, we no longer have a monopoly of privileged sources or information: our readers may know more than we do or better than we do, let’s use their knowledge.

    8. Services that enable users to personalize and store data encourage loyalty

    The audience has invested time to obtain utility, as well as generating useful customer information with value to advertisers. They won’t want to waste that effort.

    9. Creating valued niche products is vital to online success

    The Newspaper as one big package doesn’t translate online. The Newspaper online need not and should not be one thing for all customers. Digital enables products and services to be packaged and sold and deconstructed with infinite variety, according to need, to niche markets; The Newspaper can and should vary the scope, scale and voice of the proposition for different audiences within the boundaries of quality set by the brand. We might want to create a portfolio of service brands to reflect this.

    10. Foster synergies between channels and recognise channel differences

    The print edition is the brand champion; the web has infinite depth and breadth; mobile offers ubiquity and convenience. So each product niche can exploit multiple channels and each channel can point to the others (eg. a permalink for every newspaper page).

    11. The Newspaper is not of itself merely ‘a newspaper’ – The Newspaper is a brand and that’s where its value lies.

    We’ve built a reputation that represents a point of view and a set of values over the past [insert number] years. Under our imprint and around our content we offer all sorts of products and services that fit with our point of view and values. The brand can be extended into any area where its qualities – such as, for example, inside knowledge, professional network, good with money, political nouse – have value. So funnily enough it’s not content that’s king, it’s the brand.

    12. Protect and build the value of The Newspaper brand

    There’s a tried and tested set of commercial and professional standards in newspapers. Everyone knows the rules (around the separation of advertising and editorial, for example) that preserved the integrity of the old editorial product. In digital, where fact and opinion and product and purchase start to merge dangerously into each other, new principles are needed and especially around commercial recommendations. Readers don’t mind being sold too if they’ve chosen to express an interest, and they’ll buy because they trust us so long as what we sell fits with how they perceive us at our best. In short, we mustn’t enter into partnerships that make short term commercial sense but destroy the value of our reputation (it’s amazing how often companies do this, especially where individuals are paid commissions for short term gain).

    13. Print web first

    It’s not sustainable to behave as though the newspaper is the one and only place where important news can be published.

    14. We have unlimited space online, use it

    This means opening up the filing cabinet and putting it online, replacing the news pyramid with the news iceberg that goes deep down into the waters. Use the web to publish or link to everything we have: background, archive, source material, images – become a curator of stories and themes.

    15. Connect to the rest of the web openly

    The Newspaper’s content and tools will live as effectively outside its URL as inside. If we make our content available widely, paid or unpaid, we raise our profile and increase our reach internationally and domestically; we also undercut clippings agencies and other copier/reusers. Remember, the value is in the service around the content, not just the content itself. So, use rss, third party feeds, The Newspaper API(s) and widgets to give people access to The Newspaper, paid for or free, as we decide, outside The Newspaper.com. If in doubt, we give it out, because we treat people who share and re-use our content as friends not threats.

    That’s enough principles [Ed.]

  • Somewhere over the paywall: 3 predictions for news media

    Two weeks ago, some colleagues and I attended a Frontline Club talk on apps, paywalls and the future of journalism (for a recap, see William Owen’s excellent post). I found the experience very interesting but also very frustrating. I should say up front that this post is deliberately provocative: I am heartsick at the state of the news industry (one I respect and value to no end) and I want to do something about it — or at least start a discussion that does.

    Publishers are erecting paywalls all over the place — The Times last week, The New York Times next year — but to what end? By throwing their content behind paywalls, publishers are indulging themselves in a knee-jerk reaction that — I think — will decimate their market share and brand value, ultimately to fatal consequences.

    Publishers should be rethinking digital as a universe of potential profit. They should be embracing change and changing with it, but instead they’re freaking out and locking up the content. This just won’t work.

    The internet has irrevocably — and nearly globally — democratised information. Content as content is free, and content producers cannot ask consumers to change their behaviour or expectations to meet a bottom line. That’s just not how it works. There is so much good content out there, people will simply decline to pay and move on to a free content source — and there are many.

    In order to survive, publishers must change the way they approach the business of content, newspapers, and digital news platforms. Here are my three predictions for the industry.

    Read full post

  • Three fallacies of newspaper thinking (and how paywalls cracked at the Frontline Club)

    My first trip to the Frontline Club last night (thanks, @saradotdub) was rewarded with a lively and contentious debate on the future of newspapers featuring The Times digital director, Gurtej Sandhu, enduring a severe cross-examination on Murdoch’s paywall strategy. It came from all sides: the Chair (the subtle and persistent Steve Hewlett) fellow panel members and the floor.

    My takeaway was that the discussion highlighted three fallacies that still govern much newspaper thinking.

    Fallacy Number One is that the internet is free because of a mix of habit and a spurious moral right, and that if you can change habits and challenge morality we’ll go back to paying for content.

    This is confusing newspapers with content. We used to pay for newspapers because they had a monopoly of the means of production, and to get the content we had to pay for paper, printworkers, printing machines and trucks. The internet reduces the cost of material production and distribution to virtually nil and reveals that whatever we used to pay for content was a fraction of the total newstand price, and we paid for that because we couldn’t get it elsewhere, which brings us to…

    Fallacy Number Two: that a newspaper’s competition is other newspapers.

    Panel member Doublas McCabe suggested that if every newspaper went behind a paywall we might start to pay again. This misses the point that we can now get the news from a myriad sources, not just ‘newspapers’: specialist blogs, tv websites, Google, twitter, etc. ad infinitum. The monopoly no longer exists and everybody can be a media owner (picture me waving my iphone in the air) and for this reason alone content is worth much less than it used to be – sometimes actually nothing – unless it occupies a privileged niche, as does the Financial Times (represented last night by product manager Marybeth Christie with a lively account of experimentation and research in different ways of paying and consuming).

    Fallacy Number Three is that nothing else changes, content is still just the end product of the publishing process.

    Steve Hewlett made the point that, even when we paid for newspapers, our secondary consumption (eg. in a library archive) and conversation was free. It was, and its a good point, but the network in which that conversation occured was comparatively stunted – just people we knew. Now the network of secondary consumption and conversation is gigantic and accounts for much of the value created by content in terms of comment, correction, re-use and aggregation. The relationship between journalist and audience has changed from one that’s indirect and mediated by truck and newsagent to one that’s direct and continuous, a service relationship with two-way interactions where publication is often the beginning rather than the end of content production.

    The internet creates the potential to make a fundamental change in journalistic practice and enables publishers to shift from product to service, whereby content is the means of introducing other sources of value such as real world products, information or services. This means, simply, that advertising and subscription are no longer the only revenue sources and might become secondary. This is Murdoch’s error, not realising that a newspaper isn’t a newspaper any more.

    When asked why the New York Times tried a paywall and went back to free, Gurtej Sandhu said they blinked. We wonder if The Times will be blinking, sometime in the next six months or so, when it sees the light.

    Stop press: you can watch/read about the full debate here:

    http://frontlineclub.com/blogs/theforum/2010/05/apple-and-paywalls.html

  • Transient permanence

    In amongst all the digital talk at SXSW there was one panel that felt very analogue. In fact, it was about physical things. Titled “Maps, Books, Spimes, Paper: Post-Digital Media Design” or “Get excited and make things”.

    The panel took turns to present some of their projects which by and large involved creating physical, printed objects. Yeah, print. That dirty, high-friction mechanism for disseminating information.

    Chris Heathcote kicked things off with a core argument that ‘puter screens are inherently boring and mundane and that ‘digital’ is natural and not special anymore. He used Russell Davies’s term ‘post-digital’ which is about moving screen experiences into the real world.

    Michal Migurski of awesome-ists Stamen Design described his work for Open Street Map (OSM) project - Walking Papers. This allows people to download portions of the map, print it out and draw on edits. They can then use this, once scanned back in, to make micro-level edits to the online maps.

    James Bridle talked about his own publishing exploits, creating a fieldnotes book for his trip to SXSW which included maps, notes pages and the conference schedule. In one project he created a book containing all of his tweets from a two year period packaged in a classical-looking hardback tome. Cute.

    The panel presentations finished up with Ben Terrett of Really Interesting Group talking about their Newspaper Club. This is a web-based service allowing anyone to set up and print their own newspaper. They’ve already created loads, take a look at their blog.

    The session finished by giving out a limited edition paper to all attendees.

    4446844751_0bcfc34410

    Photo courtesy Ben Terrett under Creative Commons

    Read full post

  • Looking towards more flexible web-based editorial design

    Isaac and I have been discussing how users consume media and news which has raised some interesting questions around online publishing. Specifically: how we construct content templates, how that content looks when it’s in place, art direction at a micro level and how we can create richer, more engaging and, importantly, more ‘useful’ reading experiences online.

    Over the last 4-5 years there has been a gradual convergence in how most newspaper sites construct their article pages. Based on a grid system, they employ a wide central column for the body copy and a number of other columns, usually on the right of the screen, for related information, links to other stories, MPUs, tools, etc. We should know, we’ve designed a number of sites for media owners, as well as countless blogs that conform to these conventions.

    No matter how long the article is it is wedged into the same template. If it’s 200 words, stick it in. 800 words? No problem, paginate it and reap the ad impressions.

    There’s loads of sense to this approach. The beauty of the web is its democratisation of publishing. Drop your text and image into a well crafted template and you’re away. But I think there’s room for another approach.

    Read full post

  • Designing the Future of The New York Times

    That was the title of a talk at the SxSW Interactive Festival here in Austin, Texas, that a few of us went to yesterday afternoon.

    We were all looking forward to it. We’ve got some form with newspapers in the UK, having designed sites and blogging platforms for UK broadsheets and tabloid newspapers as well as creating a hugely successful blog-based community site for the UK’s leading quality broadsheet The Daily Telegraph. We’re also long-time fans of NYTimes.com. The site delivered 20 million unique users in October 2008 (okay, it was the election but even so…) and was the fifth-ranked news site on the Internet in terms of total visitors. Consistently brilliant interactive and information graphics, and restless experimentation with new technologies and new models led us all to expect a great deal from this talk. Like many in the packed conference room, I was sadly disappointed.

    The talk was astonishingly boring and backwards-looking, as web-hating Design Director Tom Bodkin droned on and on about a glorious past that quite frankly no-one was there to hear about, starting with his college days which were a very long time ago (Tom seemed about 130 years old). Tom, the clue here was in the title of your talk – the “future” of The New York Times.

    A full 20 mins of the hour were dedicated to Tom’s slides from the heyday of hot metal. He managed to dis Razorfish in passing – the agency charged with channeling his ‘genius’ during the website’s redesign a couple of year’s back. He then set about ripping up the Web medium in general for a ‘lack of innovation’ before claiming the NYTimes website didn’t support serendipitous discovery as much as the paper product: a claim so ridiculous that I checked my ears to see if they were working properly. I say ridiculous for the simple reason that the online experience provides billions of hyperlinks that allow one to move from today’s top stories through extensive archives and related content on a fairly joyous journey of discovery in a way that the paper product simply does not.

    Next up, digital Design Director Khoi Vinh presented a series of haiku-like chunks of design philosophy – statements like “we are a platform” – and some slides of the website’s extravagantly over-designed style guides. Always suspicious of interaction designers who put so much effort into crafting linear style guides like this. There then ensued a kind of mumbling competition between the two men mainly involving the words “err” and “umm”. During this phase of the talk, delivered in a hypnotic monotone, neither man looked at the audience and Bodkin mainly looked at the table. People started leaving.

    The most staggering stuff came towards the end of the session, when Bodkin started to talk about the commercial model: “Big display ads is sort of what we’re good at”. Oh dear. Having read Clay Shirky’s brilliant description of newspapers’ broken economic model only hours before this NYTimes talk, I’m pretty sensitive to the fact that the future is *not* about big display ads. The fact that Bodkin and Vinh are still able to delude themselves to this degree speaks volumes about why some newspapers are in so much trouble. What a shame this includes the Old Grey Lady.


    Until recently, the prevailing wisdom has been that newspapers still have a few years to transition into ’something else’. Indeed, it must have looked pretty good until very recently, with online ad revenue rocketing throughout 2008. The recession changes all of that, and it now transpires that newspapers have very little time at all. It’s ten to midnight, and the style guides we were shown by Bodkin and Vinh are rather like a layout plan of deck-chairs on the Titanic’s decks made on the morning of the collision. The nostalgia is like the newspaper’s life flashing before its eyes as it lies dying, utterly surprised at the sudden worsening of its long-term illness.

    Across the industry, we’re looking at a sudden collapse rather than a managed transition, but it’s noteworthy and encouraging for us Brits that our newspapers seem to ‘get it’ much more than our US cousins. It is utterly unthinkable that the Guardian or Telegraph would make the kind of presentation we saw yesterday, and it’s clear that both are gearing up very quickly for the next surge towards becoming Web-driven products.

    I doubt you’ll find the NYTimes presentation on SlideShare. And if you did wouldn’t find much at all about the future. They can’t admit it to themselves, let alone tell anyone else about it.

  • Why all newspapers need a printed permalink

    Have you ever been reading your daily morning commute newspaper and stumbled across a great article and thought “I must share that with my friend X”. After getting to work, after partaking in your morning coffee, you browse through that papers online edition as you know with today’s more-convergent news operations everything is re-published online. Then you can twitter, del.icio.us or email that link off. But it’s impossible to find and the newspaper’s online search can’t find it because lets face-it their search is terrible. You give in and return to Techcrunch.

    So all I want is something dead simple. Why don’t newspapers publish a small tinyurl permalink underneath every article title pointing to it’s location in that newspaper ’s online website. Then when I see something interesting I want to read in full later, bookmark for reference or crucially share with friends and colleagues, it’s immediately available to me. I could even Twitter it on the spot.

    In the future newspapers are going to need to continue the reading experience back and forth through online and offline media to help fight the rising tide coming their way.

    So Telegraph, Guardian and Times Online how about a little link-love in the paper?

Our latest tweets

Categories

Archives

Find us on the web