<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whoever did this should be shot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034</link>
	<description>Made by Many creates very social digital stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Malbon</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Malbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>Love the conspiracy angle. Is it &#039;conspiracy marketing&#039; or a one-off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the conspiracy angle. Is it &#8216;conspiracy marketing&#8217; or a one-off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Williams</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>Yes, shot like the dogs they are... and maybe not forgiven quite so quickly with the &#039;ah, they&#039;re amateurs, it was a naive, if stupid, mistake&#039;.

As pointed out by a colleague this morning, everyone&#039;s talking about Habitat. Links from Sky, chat -- like this -- on blogs, and a surge in site traffic. When the furore dies down, their brand may be ahead!

Was it REALLY an innocent error? Don&#039;t point and call me paranoid, but I have to wonder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, shot like the dogs they are&#8230; and maybe not forgiven quite so quickly with the &#8216;ah, they&#8217;re amateurs, it was a naive, if stupid, mistake&#8217;.</p>
<p>As pointed out by a colleague this morning, everyone&#8217;s talking about Habitat. Links from Sky, chat &#8212; like this &#8212; on blogs, and a surge in site traffic. When the furore dies down, their brand may be ahead!</p>
<p>Was it REALLY an innocent error? Don&#8217;t point and call me paranoid, but I have to wonder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>@Mike I know what you mean. I think I came to this late and simply couldn&#039;t believe my eyes - and in my new spirit of trying to blog more often and not waiting until I have a huge big blog to post I went with the spasm... It *is* a dumb mistake - I suppose I would have expected even the most non-technical person to wonder what might happen if you started attaching product/brand messages to automatic stuff like hashtags... recipe for disaster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike I know what you mean. I think I came to this late and simply couldn&#8217;t believe my eyes &#8211; and in my new spirit of trying to blog more often and not waiting until I have a huge big blog to post I went with the spasm&#8230; It *is* a dumb mistake &#8211; I suppose I would have expected even the most non-technical person to wonder what might happen if you started attaching product/brand messages to automatic stuff like hashtags&#8230; recipe for disaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shah</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>I can get it cheaper in Ikea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can get it cheaper in Ikea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>This morning I was getting a little irate about people jumping down Habitat&#039;s throat for this, it all seemed a bit villagers-at-the-gates-with-pitchforks-baying-for-blood, only it&#039;s social media pundits instead of villagers and erm blogs instead of pitchforks. It didn&#039;t seem that anyone actually knew if it was really them. So, I called their head of PR Claire Durkin and asked her directly. Turns out it was them and they &quot;made a mistake&quot; and are &quot;attempting to rectify it now&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I was getting a little irate about people jumping down Habitat&#8217;s throat for this, it all seemed a bit villagers-at-the-gates-with-pitchforks-baying-for-blood, only it&#8217;s social media pundits instead of villagers and erm blogs instead of pitchforks. It didn&#8217;t seem that anyone actually knew if it was really them. So, I called their head of PR Claire Durkin and asked her directly. Turns out it was them and they &#8220;made a mistake&#8221; and are &#8220;attempting to rectify it now&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>@The Shah £29.99</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Shah £29.99</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shah</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>When you say the should pay the ultimate price, what exactly do you mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say the should pay the ultimate price, what exactly do you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew pascoe</title>
		<link>http://madebymany.co.uk/whoever-did-this-should-be-shot-002034#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew pascoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madebymany.co.uk/?p=1409#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe someone convinced them to actually start using Twitter in this many, but one small saving grace in Habitat&#039;s favour is at least they stopped that behaviour once they realised how big a f*&amp;k up it was...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t believe someone convinced them to actually start using Twitter in this many, but one small saving grace in Habitat&#8217;s favour is at least they stopped that behaviour once they realised how big a f*&amp;k up it was&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
